Hi Don,

I followed you youtube series on the pi-hosted topic, now I stand before a big set back.

Did you manage to setup the nextcloud external storage inside docker?

I've successfully mounted two ntfs HDDs to my pi 4 8g. They're working just fine on the pi itself. Then I tried to attach these to my NextCloudPi instance, which seems to not be working properly.

I added the Volume as a bind inside Portainer, and I set up the external storage inside my nc settings panel. When I now open the "folder" it is displayed as empty, although there are directories in it.

Is this a permission issue on the pi? (I do not think so, as it doesn't work even if I set chmod to 777 for all the directories inside)

How did you accomplish this, if you've even tried to do so?

Hi, I am getting the following error

Failure
OCI runtime create failed: container_linux.go:380: starting container process caused: process_linux.go:545: container init caused: rootfs_linux.go:76: mounting "/portainer/Files/AppData/Config/grafana/grafana.ini" to rootfs at "/etc/grafana/grafana.ini" caused: mount through procfd: not a directory: unknown: Are you trying to mount a directory onto a file (or vice-versa)? Check if the specified host path exists and is the expected type

All the containers have been spawned from stack, only monitoring-grafana is throwing this error. Please help :(

Question Bad Gateway on login screen after setting up Nginx Proxy Manager using template. What can I do ?

Context I was following everything that was mentioned in video and after deploying container I am unable to log in (getting bad gateway error). When I looked up in portainer log for NPM it showed this:

How can I fix it ?

Question I successfully installed RPI Docker Monitor using Install Doc. It was working just fine until I needed to do a reboot. Now I can't connect to the webserver URL:3000

Context Any additional context around the question such a link to a project where it's being implemented

What have I missed?

A WIP of arguments to add to make the container cadvisory use way less cpu.

I've been experimenting with arguments on cadvisory as it was using the most cpu by alot compared to my other containers. Used sources: https://github.com/google/cadvisor/blob/master/docs/runtime_options.md https://github.com/google/cadvisor/issues/2523 the arguments are taken from the help page of cadvisory when ran in a terminal. And tweaked based on this dashboard: https://grafana.com/grafana/dashboards/15120

I've added 2 arguments which do the following:

'--docker_only=true' Quoting the help: "Only report docker containers in addition to root stats". As i believe cadvisory is used mostly for containers, enabeling this disabled already a few metrics which lowered cpu usage alot.

'--housekeeping_interval=29s' See: https://github.com/google/cadvisor/blob/master/docs/runtime_options.md#housekeeping-intervals Per-container housekeeping is run once on each container cAdvisor tracks. This typically gets container stats. B/c the smallest size of updates is every half a minute, i would suggest doing a 29 second interval. I might be wrong, but i would say this checks the stats of the container, and based on that reports to grafana. So the higher the number the less accurate the stats, but the higher the more cpu usage it costs?

Why This Is Needed

This could save alot of cpu cycles for new users and also show outliers easier in grafana.

What Changed

Added 2 arguments (CMD) to the compose file for the rpi-monitor stack.

Notes

This PR is still in wip as i do want to double check this with someone else. Currently my own dashboard that i mixed from multiple dashboards is running fine, but the rpi-monitor doesn't weirdly enough. Even withoud any CMD args it still shows dots instead of a continous line on some graphs like the r/w for containers.

This is what i tested with the arguments: Given a rpi 4b the usage of the container cadvisory was 11-12%. This got reduced to 4-7% with using docker-only. And by adding the housekeeping_interval to 30 seconds. This reduced it to as low as 1.19-3.45%.

Congrats great work!!!I have an issue with updgrade portainer. I run command "sh ./update_portainer.sh" from your gitHub novaspirit/pi-hole and i get an error: "./update_portainer.sh: 3: function: not found"

Description: Graylog is a centralized logging solution that allows the user to aggregate and search through logs.

https://hub.docker.com/r/graylog/graylog

Only ARM64 supported.

https://docs.graylog.org/docs/docker: docker-compose example using Docker volumes.

Question I got an error in Grafana Raspberry Pi Dockers Monitor with charts "CPU Busy" and "Disk IO"

Context I just install the stack RaspberryPi-Docker-Monitor in a RPi 4 with: pi@raspberrypi:~ $ cat /etc/os-release PRETTY_NAME="Raspbian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)" NAME="Raspbian GNU/Linux" VERSION_ID="10" VERSION="10 (buster)" VERSION_CODENAME=buster ID=raspbian ID_LIKE=debian HOME_URL="http://www.raspbian.org/" SUPPORT_URL="http://www.raspbian.org/RaspbianForums" BUG_REPORT_URL="http://www.raspbian.org/RaspbianBugs"

After follow all steps documented on https://github.com/pi-hosted/pi-hosted/blob/master/docs/rpi_docker_monitor.md in Grafana dashboard a got an error in "CPU Busy" and "Disk IO" charts:

bad_data: 1:38: parse error: not a valid duration string: "2.147483647s"

Is it possible to correct it?

Summary

i install a fresh pi and can not use the pi-hosted scripts i check for issues #385 make the changes and tested for my is everting working fine now. thx to @jiimint he create issues #385

Why This Is Needed

What Changed

Added

#!/bin/sh

error() { echo -e "\e[91m$1\e[39m" exit 1 }

check_internet() { printf "Checking if you are online..." wget -q --spider http://github.com if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "Online. Continuing." else error "Offline. Go connect to the internet then run the script again." fi }

Changed

Fixed

install_docker.sh install_portainer.sh update_portainer.sh

Removed

couple litte syntax errors in the error function

Warning we automatically generate the following files, your change(s) will overwritten.

• docs/README.md
• template/portainer-v2-arm32.json
• template/portainer-v2-arm64.json
• template/portainer-v2-amd64.json
• tools/README.md
• docs/AppList.md
• docs/DocumentList.md
• pi-hosted_template/template/portainer-v2.json

Please make any changes to these files instead

• template/apps/some-application-name.json
• stack/some-stack-name.yml
• docs/some-docsname.md
• tools/some-script.sh
• build/info.json

I’ve seen this template: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/technorabilia/portainer-templates/main/lsio/templates/templates-2.0.json And though, why not add adguard from that? Source https://www.reddit.com/r/portainer/comments/mlzp8z/140_portainer_app_templates_for_linuxserverio/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

installation script doesnt work on my tinker board s it gives these errors: curl failed to verify the legitimacy of the server and therefore could not establish a secure connection to it

gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.

i think the way to fix curl problem is by adding -k before the url to not verify ssl

Hello,

I'm running NextcloudPi (docker ARM version), on a RPI4.

After the update of this container it seems that the NextcloudPi interface is "blank' :

It seems to be something similar to this but I don't know if someone had the same problem with the docker version.

Nextcloud is always in maintenance mode and I can do nothing on the NextcloudPi interface, I'm locked and I don't really understand why.

Any ideas ?

Question Your question here.

When doing a search on Whoogle is it normal for the search engine to ask which search site to use, when I watched your whoogle video usage this behaviour never occurs.

Context Any additional context around the question, such a link to a project where it's being implemented.

Whoogle search operates on Raspberry P in docker, but the search is done in the Brave browser on the macOS.

System Settings Linux Raspberry Pi 5.15.61-v8+ #1579 SMP PREEMPT Name="Debian GNU/Linux" Version_ID="11" Version="11 (Bullseye)" Version_Codename=Bullseye

macOS = Big Sur

#############################

Whoogle installed without any known issues in portainer, however failure to retain an IP address after 60sec shows sign of problems, hence I'm providing the log file of the issues.

_whoogle_logs.txt

Thanks in advance

I've been using transmission with ipvanish since the video went live on youtube with no issues. then suddenly it stopped working. it would always say starting but never actually start. I redid everything thinking it would work again like it did before and nope.

this is what it started doing

Provider IPVANISH has a custom setup script, executing it Downloading OpenVPN config bundle configs.zip into temporary file /tmp/tmp.noMfIe Extract OpenVPN config bundle into /etc/openvpn/ipvanish unzip: short read Starting container with revision: 47f32618629b0144f492b9116f77978d4c991712 Creating TUN device /dev/net/tun mknod: /dev/net/tun: File exists Using OpenVPN provider: IPVANISH Provider IPVANISH has a custom setup script, executing it Downloading OpenVPN config bundle configs.zip into temporary file /tmp/tmp.MlOflc Extract OpenVPN config bundle into /etc/openvpn/ipvanish unzip: short read Starting container with revision: 47f32618629b0144f492b9116f77978d4c991712 Creating TUN device /dev/net/tun mknod: /dev/net/tun: File exists Using OpenVPN provider: IPVANISH Provider IPVANISH has a custom setup script, executing it Downloading OpenVPN config bundle configs.zip into temporary file /tmp/tmp.JnfcNG Extract OpenVPN config bundle into /etc/openvpn/ipvanish unzip: short read Starting container with revision: 47f32618629b0144f492b9116f77978d4c991712 Creating TUN device /dev/net/tun mknod: /dev/net/tun: File exists Using OpenVPN provider: IPVANISH Provider IPVANISH has a custom setup script, executing it Downloading OpenVPN config bundle configs.zip into temporary file /tmp/tmp.kBbIjm Extract OpenVPN config bundle into /etc/openvpn/ipvanish unzip: short read Starting container with revision: 47f32618629b0144f492b9116f77978d4c991712 Creating TUN device /dev/net/tun mknod: /dev/net/tun: File exists Using OpenVPN provider: IPVANISH Provider IPVANISH has a custom setup script, executing it Downloading OpenVPN config bundle configs.zip into temporary file /tmp/tmp.obDcnD Extract OpenVPN config bundle into /etc/openvpn/ipvanish unzip: short read Starting container with revision: 47f32618629b0144f492b9116f77978d4c991712 Creating TUN device /dev/net/tun mknod: /dev/net/tun: File exists Using OpenVPN provider: IPVANISH Provider IPVANISH has a custom setup script, executing it Downloading OpenVPN config bundle configs.zip into temporary file /tmp/tmp.GBJCkM Extract OpenVPN config bundle into /etc/openvpn/ipvanish unzip: short read Starting container with revision: 47f32618629b0144f492b9116f77978d4c991712 Creating TUN device /dev/net/tun mknod: /dev/net/tun: File exists Using OpenVPN provider: IPVANISH Provider IPVANISH has a custom setup script, executing it Downloading OpenVPN config bundle configs.zip into temporary file /tmp/tmp.jalBKG Extract OpenVPN config bundle into /etc/openvpn/ipvanish unzip: short read Starting container with revision: 47f32618629b0144f492b9116f77978d4c991712 Creating TUN device /dev/net/tun mknod: /dev/net/tun: File exists Using OpenVPN provider: IPVANISH Provider IPVANISH has a custom setup script, executing it Downloading OpenVPN config bundle configs.zip into temporary file /tmp/tmp.CKLkFd Extract OpenVPN config bundle into /etc/openvpn/ipvanish unzip: short read Starting container with revision: 47f32618629b0144f492b9116f77978d4c991712 Creating TUN device /dev/net/tun mknod: /dev/net/tun: File exists Using OpenVPN provider: IPVANISH Provider IPVANISH has a custom setup script, executing it Downloading OpenVPN config bundle configs.zip into temporary file /tmp/tmp.Gnenhk Extract OpenVPN config bundle into /etc/openvpn/ipvanish unzip: short read Starting container with revision: 47f32618629b0144f492b9116f77978d4c991712 Creating TUN device /dev/net/tun mknod: /dev/net/tun: File exists Using OpenVPN provider: IPVANISH Provider IPVANISH has a custom setup script, executing it Downloading OpenVPN config bundle configs.zip into temporary file /tmp/tmp.NIaLAO Extract OpenVPN config bundle into /etc/openvpn/ipvanish unzip: short read Starting container with revision: 47f32618629b0144f492b9116f77978d4c991712 Creating TUN device /dev/net/tun mknod: /dev/net/tun: File exists Using OpenVPN provider: IPVANISH Provider IPVANISH has a custom setup script, executing it Downloading OpenVPN config bundle configs.zip into temporary file /tmp/tmp.ceEpDO Extract OpenVPN config bundle into /etc/openvpn/ipvanish unzip: short read Starting container with revision: 47f32618629b0144f492b9116f77978d4c991712 Creating TUN device /dev/net/tun mknod: /dev/net/tun: File exists Using OpenVPN provider: IPVANISH Provider IPVANISH has a custom setup script, executing it Downloading OpenVPN config bundle configs.zip into temporary file /tmp/tmp.AKgloM Extract OpenVPN config bundle into /etc/openvpn/ipvanish unzip: short read Starting container with revision: 47f32618629b0144f492b9116f77978d4c991712 Creating TUN device /dev/net/tun mknod: /dev/net/tun: File exists Using OpenVPN provider: IPVANISH Provider IPVANISH has a custom setup script, executing it Downloading OpenVPN config bundle configs.zip into temporary file /tmp/tmp.BKHkac Extract OpenVPN config bundle into /etc/openvpn/ipvanish unzip: short read

With all these hosted docker services, the moment you open up your network without a good firewall, it might get slammed with unknown/unauthorized requests..

CrowdSec + a bouncer might be useful since it can be used on a pi too.

https://hub.docker.com/r/crowdsecurity/crowdsec